Robotic White Cane for Assistive Navigation
Although many advances have been made in navigation assistive devices
for the blind and visually impaired, the white cane remains the most
functional and reliable navigation tool for most people who are visually
impaired. A project co-funded by the National Institutes of Health’s
National Eye Institute
(NEI) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and
Bioengineering (NIBIB) sought to improve upon this century-old
technology with modern electronics. As the lead author of the study
explains, while GPS-based applications
have revolutionized navigation in outdoor settings, helping the blind
find their way around in large spaces inside buildings can present
challenges, a gap he hopes to close through his robotic white cane.
These improvements include the integration of a color 3D camera, an
inertial measurement sensor, and an on-board computer, whose software
can be paired with a building’s architectural blueprints or floorplans
to guide users to destinations using auditory and sensory cues. The
color depth camera, in particular, uses infrared light (similar to the
front-facing camera of most smartphones) to determine the distance
between the user and other physical objects. This information is
processed by the onboard computer, which then maps the user's location
onto the building's architectural drawings to alert the user to
obstacles. The project lead adds, “The rolling tip on our robotic cane
can guide you to turn at just the
right point and exactly the right number of degrees, whether it’s 15
degrees or 90. This version can also alert you to overhanging obstacles,
which a standard white cane cannot.” The robotic white cane is still in
development to slim down some of its features for regular use.
Nonetheless, the ability to switch between the automated mode and the
simpler, non-robotic mode could provide additional independence for
people who are blind or visually impaired without losing the time-tested
attributes of the traditional white cane.
Eyeglasses to Boost Academic Performance in School
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University Wilmer Eye Institute and School
of
Education conducted a large clinical study, the most robust study in the
U.S. to date on the impact of glasses
on education. Vision for Baltimore was a project launched by Johns
Hopkins researchers in 2016 in an effort to address the acute need for
vision care among the city’s public school students. In addition to
providing more than $1 million in support, Johns Hopkins
works closely with the program team to provide technical assistance. In
the five years, the program has tested the vision of more than
64,000 students and distributed more than 8,000 pairs of glasses. Now in
its sixth year, Vision for Baltimore is operated and funded in
partnership with the Johns Hopkins schools of
Education and Medicine, Baltimore City Public Schools, the Baltimore
City Health Department, eyewear brand Warby Parker, and national
nonprofit Vision To Learn. The study, a three-year randomized clinical
trial, analyzed the performance of 2,304 students in grades 3 to 7 who
received
screenings, eye examinations and eyeglasses from Vision for Baltimore,
looking in particular at their scores on standardized reading and math
tests over 1 and 2 years. They found significant improvements in math
scores in the elementary school grades, and improvements in reading
scores in the first year. The researchers encourage sustained use of
glasses to maintain gains in academic achievement thereafter. As the
senior author of the study states, “We rigorously demonstrated that
giving kids the glasses they need helps them succeed in school...[and]
has major implications for advancing health and educational
equity all across the country.” Johns Hopkins President Ron Daniels
adds, “These results validate the dedication of all of the program’s
committed
partners, from the principals, staff and teachers across Baltimore City
schools to the optometrists at Vision to Learn and the school vision
advocates from Johns Hopkins. Looking forward, we hope to work with our
state and city leaders to ensure that this impactful program has
sustainable funding for years to come.”
Blue Widefield SLO to Evaluate Diabetic Retinopathy
In a retrospective study, researchers in Japan examined blue widefield
scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) in the evaluation of non-perfusion
areas (ischemia) and retinal thinning in diabetic retinopathy (DR). This
method follows earlier imaging techniques using fluorescein angiography
(FA) and multicolor widefield SLO, which uses laser light in
simultaneous red, green, and blue wavelengths. The researchers found
that the blue images captured by conventional SLO could reveal
hyporeflective areas in the retina indicative of damage, and sought to
explore this finding further in widefield SLO. The retrospective
observational case series compared blue widefield SLO with fluorescein
angiography in 90 patients with diabetes; in individuals with diabetic
retinopathy, retinal morphology was further examined with optical
coherence tomography (OCT). The senior author of the study explains, “We
found that the hyporeflective areas in the blue widefield SLO images
appeared to correspond with areas of ischemia in the fluorescein
angiogram images of patients with DR. We were pleased to find that the
rate of concordance was
high.” Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, however, is advantageous in that
it is non-invasive compared to fluorescein angiography, which uses an
intravenous dye. Furthermore, they found that the ischemic areas
correspond with retinal thinning. As another researcher comments, “It’s
possible that the blue wavelength of light can pass more easily
through these thinned areas of the retina, which present as
hyporeflective areas in the SLO images." Given its non-invasive nature
and wider field of view, now enhanced with the detection of ischemia and
retinal thinning via the blue wavelength, blue widefield SLO could
offer new advantages in the detection and evaluation of diabetic
retinopathy.
Tetrodotoxin Explored as a Treatment for Amblyopia
Amblyopia results when there are underdeveloped connections between the
eye and the brain, and can have etiologies ranging from congenital
cataracts to strabismus (an eye misalignment), to anisometropia (unequal
refractive state), all of which prevent the affected eye from resolving
clear images to form the necessary neural connections. The predominant
view is that there is a critical period during childhood after which
amblyopia cannot be reversed, even after the underlying etiology is
corrected. Aside from behavioral approaches, clinicians have relied on
"patching" of the unaffected eye with the thought that the affected eye
would form stronger synapses with the brain. This "patching" can be a
physical patch over the eye, the same concept of which is retained in
more recent uses of atropine eye drops to blur vision in the unaffected
eye. Neuroscientists exploring ways to reverse amblyopia have found
success in a novel approach, namely, by injection of tetrodotoxin
(TTX), which temporarily (reversibly) anesthetizes the retina of the
unaffected eye. Experiments in two animal models (mice and cats) have
produced "an unequaled profile of recovery" in the amblyopic eye even
after the critical period. This recovery was seen in every animal they
tested. At the
neurological level, synapses that are weak wither in a process known as
"long-term depression." However, the researchers explain that temporarily, but completely, suspending visual input creates a condition in which the synaptic
connections can fully restrengthen, as if being
“rebooted.”
In an earlier study
from 2016, the researchers showed that they could reverse amblyopia by
anesthetizing both retinas. In the present study, they were able to
limit the effect of TTX to the retina of only the non-amblyopic eye.
Additionally, the current study was conducted in mature amblyopic
animals that were not responsive to other forms of treatment. The
scientists even observed that neurons that shrink with amblyopia
regained normal size after treatment. Finally, in addition to improving
vision in the amblyopic eye (i.e., reversing amblyopia), visual
responses recovered to normal levels in the eye that received the TTX in
every animal tested, demonstrating no lasting negative effects. It should be noted that a major difference between this approach and prior variations of
"patching" is in the complete inactivation of vision that triggers
strengthening of synapses in the affected
eye. The researchers will pursue further studies to explore tetrodotoxin as an option for adults who suffer from amblyopia. As co-lead author of the study remarks, “I
am hopeful and optimistic that this study can provide a pathway for a
new and more effective approach to amblyopia treatment. I am very proud
to have been part of this rewarding collaboration.”
Case Report: Direct Voluntary Control of Pupil Size
Pupil contriction and dilation are controlled by the autonomic nervous
system, a process that was once thought to be automatic in response to
stimuli, such as light/darkness, arousing emotions, or mental effort.
While indirect voluntary control of pupil size
in response to imaginary light has been documented in the
literature—for example, imagining a "sunny sky" or a "dark room"
resulted in pupillary constriction and dilation, respectively—directly
controlling the iris sphincter and dilator musculature was thought to be
impossible. That is, until a psychology student in Germany approached
his professor, one of the researchers, about his unusual ability to
"tremble" his eyeballs. Known by his initials D.W., the student reports,
"Constricting the pupil feels like gripping, tensing something; making
it larger feels like fully releasing, relaxing the eye." Interestingly,
D.W. described having initially practiced the ability by focusing in
front of or behind an object, not unlike the miosis and mydriasis that
occurs as a result of convergence and divergence of the eyes,
respectively. According to the authors, "[I]t seems plausible that [D.W.] could have learned to gain
control over the pupillary response by decoupling pupil size changes
from accommodation and vergence in the near triad." After
a while, D.W. states that all he needed to do to change his pupil size
was to concentrate, noting that he doesn't have to imagine bright or
dark environments.
The researchers performed a variety of tests, such as measuring the
voltage on the skin as a proxy for mental effort, to rule out indirect
ways of controlling pupil size. They then measured D.W.'s dilation of
pupil diameter to be around 0.8 mm and constriction of pupil diameter to
be around 2.4 mm. Moreover, even closer than his near point of
accommodation or NPA (that is, the distance at which accommodation is
maximal, at which a small object held in front of the eye, such as the
tip of a pen, cannot be clearly resolved), D.W. could voluntarily
constrict his pupils further. The authors report, "Even
at maximal accommodation, [D.W.] voluntarily constricted his pupil
without changing vergence and could improve visual acuity by >6 diopters." Task-based
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) showed increased activity
in brain areas responsible for volitional impulses, in this case, the
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, adjacent premotor areas, and
supplementary motor area. And although the researchers cannot elucidate
any connections between these cortical areas and the sympathetic or
parasympathetic pathways that ultimately control autonomic pupillary
reactions, nor can they definitively rule out that D.W. was using
indirect strategies to change his pupil size, they found no evidence of
such from the tests they performed. Accordingly, they conclude that this
is the first reported case of direct voluntary control of pupil size.
In Other News
(1) How a robot's gaze can affect human decision-making (Related) (Related)
(2) New England College of Optometry to launch hybrid training program
(3) Look to ophthalmology for a glimpse of telemedicine's future
Saturday, October 9, 2021
Week in Review: Number 35
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment